quatuor27
21
Hahaha....
Sep 04, 2016,07:49 AM
Your equation seems about right! LOL
The sentimental reasoning is so true..
After awhile, everything becomes sentimental! This message has been edited by quatuor27 on 2016-09-04 07:50:27
Comments:
view entire thread
What's the perfect number of watches to own?
By: Harry2 : September 1st, 2016-03:11
Hi friends! I'm on night shift and thinking about the perfect number of watches, and what opinions my fellow purists hold. I have two theories: Theory 1: optimum number of watches can be expressed as w=c + 1 Where 'w' is optimum number of watches, 'c' is ...
33
By: Baron - Mr Red : September 1st, 2016-03:16
But the caveat here is that this number does not include sentimental watches. Y=X + A - (B)^c Where X (for me) is 33, B is the number of sentimental watches owned), c is the growth factor for future sentimental watches, and A is in irrational number that ...
Hahaha....
By: quatuor27 : September 4th, 2016-07:49
Your equation seems about right! LOL The sentimental reasoning is so true.. After awhile, everything becomes sentimental!
7 more than the maximum number you think is reasonable.
By: Bounce781 : September 1st, 2016-03:21
But when you get to that reasonable number inevitably you find 2 others that you just MUST have. Then you find a couple more, so that you are +4 to previous reasonable number Then you reason, well I'll add just one more, so I'll only be 5 more than my pre...
If I could get....
By: Ares501 - Mr Green : September 1st, 2016-03:28
GP Jackpot tourbillon I would say one If not then I would say UN Trilogy set and I would say three Honesty if you have your grail (let the stoning begin ) I would say 1 Yours D
+++1. [nt]
By: amanico : September 1st, 2016-06:10
Your theory 1 seems right.
By: zabreg1 Mr White : September 1st, 2016-03:36
But I am guessing that no one on this site would say anything less than 5.
5^x [nt]
By: Baron - Mr Red : September 1st, 2016-03:41
I hear a true Purist talking!
By: Ornatus-Mundi : September 1st, 2016-12:16
however, in my personal situation that could very well be just one, very careful chosen (and probably customised) watch. Magnus
You need 7 for a week.
By: TheMadDruid : September 1st, 2016-05:53
But you need 31 for a month. So I guess 38. Of course you need 7 for a week-long vacation. And if you are lucky enough to be able to take a two-week vacation, then the number is 14. So, 38 + 7 + 14 is 59. 59 watches are what you need.
12 is the magic number
By: Arie - Mr Orange : September 2nd, 2016-02:54
I\'m seriously going for 12 max. If anything new comes in after reaching 12 something will just have to go. Thank god I bought a SevenFriday so we all know which one will fly out of the window without a blink of an eye
:-)
By: Bounce781 : September 4th, 2016-19:25
I like the idea of a sacrifice watch when you reach your "maximum", so that way, there is always a chance of buying more pieces. Clever!
Unbelievable probably :-)
By: sham1 : September 1st, 2016-10:03
But I would settle for one if it was either a Patek Philippe 5270R (perpetual calendar chronograph) or a Patek 5078R (minute repeater). I think in some circles these watches are the epitome of watch making. However, more realistically as my current budget...
Very well put mate!
By: Harry2 : September 2nd, 2016-07:43
Yes it is cheaper than wives, and I also think it is good to let go. I am a wrist time guy also that wants to keep life easy and simple, I don\'t want a collection so big I can\'t wear them all often. Except maybe a one (let\'s face it, or two) piece (s) ...
Well....I managed to whittle down to 12
By: rnaden : September 2nd, 2016-04:49
Thinking it was the perfect number - 12 months in a year, 12 watches - was a perfect number, or so I thought. Then whimsical purchases took it upwards, and now I'm back at 13....some call it an unlucky, number, but I think it is a "right" number for me, s...
Very funny answers!! :-)
By: MTR : September 2nd, 2016-05:46
I would like to join the party and expand your formula! w = s - s*a + s*cc Legend: w = number of watches s = spouse a = angry factor cc = calmed down and just come back factor Everything is in balance as long as: a or at at least: a = cc. Seriously for me...
Its the same for bikes!
By: jml_watches : September 2nd, 2016-15:09
hard tail mtb, full suspension bike, road bike, hybrid, folding, fixie & hack then you start wondering why there's a bike in the dining room. At least watches are a bit smaller Cheers JML
I used to cycle a lot!
By: Harry2 : September 2nd, 2016-18:52
And I agree, cycling is notorious for quantity of gear.
I have no clue.
By: JerryW : September 3rd, 2016-16:02
When I first started following thePuristS I thought the people with over 10 watches were crazy, well I joined the crazy club I guess a while back. I honestly have no clue how many watches I own and I do not want to know, just in case my wife asks. Just en...
I say 7 watches is all you need
By: AnthonyTsai : September 3rd, 2016-16:15
Anything else, is excessive IMO! Tons of watches turn into safe queens and never see the day of light since you have too many. If 7 is still too much for you, then I suggest 3 high quality pieces which you consider "perfect watches". Cheers, Anthony
Personally... I think 15 is the ideal number...
By: andrewluff : September 4th, 2016-02:40
and was my goal to trim down to 15, but it hasn't happened yet... but I think that probably 15 or so are on my wrist regularly so does that mean I can get rid of the rest... umm no way... its like a father giving a child away So this doesn't help really.....
The Solution
By: DaneRoth : September 4th, 2016-21:39
3 more than 7 one for everyday of the week and 3 extra for in between thats the solution
Use the average!
By: Harry2 : September 7th, 2016-01:38
Then you get to have more than they say, yet they can\'t blame you for not compromising!